23 Nov


Fourteen year old girls ruin everything. From the late 1980s to the turn of the new century their unbelievable purchasing power and rabid fandom put America at large through the torture of boy bands, and their droves returned in 2008 to elevate the first Twilight to box office returns far above its lackluster production values and horrid script. Twilight’s smaltzy take on ancient Romanian mythical creatures ramps up the cheese factor in the film’s sequel: New Moon. This time, its melodramatic aesthetics boils over into the werewolf mythos as well. Twilight Saga: New Moon is a film that can bring out the cinema snob in literally anyone. Its flaccid story and abuse of slow-motion pan shots fill any intelligent person so full of sap they’ll have to detox with Mexican soap operas.

The Twilight Saga New Moon movie image Kristen Stewart

Bella Swan (Kristen Stewart) again proves herself the most powerful being in the film. Her ability to trap metrosexual creatures of the night in un-erotic gazes of inexplicable passion going unbeaten throughout the film’s 130 minutes. Recovering from her near fatal vampire attack by celebrating her birthday with a group of vampires, Bella gets a paper-cut that sends one of the undead into a blood lust, causing Bella’s beau Edward Cullen (Robert Pattinson) to finally realize how much danger he puts her in with his presence and ditches her. After a brief period of lukewarm moroseness, Bella reunites with her old friend Jacob Black (Taylor Lautner), their burgeoning relationship slowly revealing his guise as a werewolf. As Black’s clan later collides with Cullen’s family, Bella may be forced to choose between the two “men;” unpredictable futures lying in wait on either side.


The film’s plot is disbursed evenly between drawn-out scenes of pseudo-romantic moments between Bella and her supernatural boy toys, which try to emphasize the torturous passions between them, although because of the quality of acting it comes off more as minute long examinations of each other’s faces. Despite an immortal supporting cast, Kristen’s Bella is the deadest faced, with each of the two competing males mustering only their sentence-long character traits: Edward is sullen and mysterious, Jack is tan and sporting adorable muscles. These muscles are surprisingly integral to the storyline, as werewolves apparently have the ability to remain shirtless in human form during the rainy season. Michel Sheen’s pitiable appearance towards the climax as Vampire family-head Aro almost gives the film a moment of passable performance, but he’s quickly drowned in the sadistically histrionic storyline.


If praise must be laden upon the original film, the helicopter landscape shots definitely captured the Pacific Northwest in a gorgeous light, giving the woods an appropriate mystical quality. But with Catherine Hardwicke – the first film’s director – thrown out the picture, the Hollywood mainstay theory of “more is better” takes full effect. While the scenery may occasionally be captured correctly, the camera takes the pan and tracking shot motif miles beyond its limit, the camera trying it’s best to make two groups of soon-to-be Abercrombie and Fitch models epic. Most likely realizing their mistake in post-production, the film attempts to compensate with slow-motion shots, to the degree that any inherent beauty or complexity a fight/battle scene could hold is stretched so thin it nearly tears the film in the projection reel. The producers also took unfortunate note of the Cult of Edward, giving the vampire the ability to slow down the film’s speed with every walking shot he takes. Every. Single. One.


Computer effects are decent and without noticeable flaw, but again, when slowed down they become more tepid than the novel the film is based on. Makeup is used hilariously, with the Vampires looking like the antagonist of “Blade Trinity” when he covered his vampiric face in sunscreen. Costumes occasionally breach mediocrity and deliver a truly lived-in looking piece, sometimes being the only respite in the eye-sexing scenes between the couples. The soundtrack comes complete with a handful of flavorless pop songs, their punctuation into the film’s routine orchestral track creating a real “lesser of two evils” sensation. Simply put, if you can find something positive in the design of New Moon, a career in forensic criminology might just be the career for you.


The most frustrating aspect of The Twilight Saga: New Moon is that its mountain of faults will be ignored by the box office. Its mobs of fans will be sedated by shots of boy-torso and abstinence-approved love scenes and eagerly gobble up their required ten pounds of merchandise. What had slowly been developing in the 1990s with Bram Stoker’s Dracula and Interview with the Vampire has been set back decades by a demographic whose only music expertise exists within the Disney pop library. If a rare slip into dramatic irony may be permitted: Vampires are Dead.

13 thoughts on “The Twilight Saga: New Moon”

  1. I’d like to observe a moment of silence for the brain cells that Gavin lost while watching this tripe.

    Twilight is simultaneously detrimental to the progress of both cinema and literature, not to mention its toll on society in general.

    Too bad such a talented actress as Dakota Fanning had to be in it. But considering how much money this’ll make, I can understand how principles take a back seat to ludicrous amounts of cash.

    1. I think Dakota Fanning completely loves the books, and so the role was a dream come true for her.

      So, the series is the closest think that I can consider ‘the bane of my existance.’ My girlfriend has read the books 4 times through, bought the first movie (after she admitted how badly it was made), and even bought the board game. I HATE IT. It’s an obsession that goes way beyond my love of video games, and it literally steals her away for days at a time.

  2. Gavin, I feel sorry for you. I have a solution, watch the first Blade (the other two were a joke), and Blood The Last Vampire, I think that might help clear your mind of this atrocity.

      1. Oh good, cause I needed to detox myself from the Live action version of Blood the last Vampire by watching the Anime version. Such unnecessary slow-mo.

  3. Upon viewing this movie, my eyes had never before grasped such wonderment. Truly, this movie = 11/10

    The acting performance is so superb and believable that even The Godfather seems empty in comparison. However this achievement is partly due to the sensational dialogue portrayed through excellent scripting. Classic and modern literature alike fare little to match its perfection. The romantic love triangle is so surreal, so breathtaking, that Romeo and Juliet, Titanic, and even the mighty Brokeback Mountain fail to match its magnificence. I have truly been blessed to have been in the presence of this remarkable movie.

    Now, as I type with blurred vision from the happiness I weep, I am overjoyed to venture outdoors and tell a neighbor passerby “I have lived!” Once in a persons lifetime, true utopia may be reached. This is that moment. A moment that could only be brought about by that which one may call: The Perfect Film.

    1. Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo! Eric, are you still there?

      Stat, we need to save this poor man, quickly, he needs an intervention.

      Nice Satire post!

  4. The movie is not meant for us, its meant for teenage girls. I have yet to meet a teenage girl that hasn’t loved it. Therefore it succeeded IMO

      1. The thing is, it really isn’t bad. the acting is average, the production value is extremely high, its pretty average overall. We just don’t like it because its not meant for us. In fact it bothers us for the most part because it is really mainstream, popular, and girls love it. These are the opposite of what gamers are and like. If this movie was some unheard of movie that we all just sat down and watched, we would think it was pretty average. Its the advertising and way its porteyed in the media that makes you hate it so much. In fact its actively marketed against us (18-24 males), from a marketing perspective, because our taste is the opposite of young preteen/teen girls.

        1. As I state in my review, even an analysis from a purely technical standpoint turns up nothing of value. I admit a gap between myself and the film’s intended audience readily within the piece, but in the catering to this demographic, the film has taken an extraordinarily lazy route in production values. This entire piece was a desperate attempt on my part to explain in the most syntactical and cinematic terms possible, how this movie is incredibly sub-par.

Comments are closed.